People dream of impending free education that has been eagerly awaited since the time of independence from the Republic of Indonesia has emerged with the arrival of the phenomenon as a free education for Elementary and Junior Secondary School. The phenomenon of free education is indeed very long-awaited, the article of the Government issued BOS (School Operational Cost) to cover the prices of books that were increasingly inflated, it's donations, teacher salaries are not enough and other charges.
Pros Cons of Free Education
Judging from its development, this phenomenon can not be separated from the pros and cons. For the pros with the programs say that it is the government's efforts to improve the quality of education and decreasing numbers of school dropouts, free schooling for parents to reduce the burden of his mind to the issue of education costs and no more kids who should not take the exam only because it has not paid the school fees. While the cons say the government is like saviors, This is because there has been the first to do so, the NGOs concerned with education and treatment community can not afford. The existence of the school lacked a sense of need, awareness of the education is lacking, children are more concerned with jobs than have schools that do not spend anything. Cost of free education only up to Junior Secondary School Senior Secondary School while not. While Ataslah Senior High School graduate who is the main spear and age are established to search for jobs and generating foreign exchange.
Schools to be qualified because sustained by learners who have a passion to learn.They want to learn if there are challenges, one of which cost challenges. Fostered the young generation not to have a completely free mentally. Should mentally free washing away. Hard working, humble, tolerant, able to adapt, and piety, that is what should be grown so that younger generations are able to compete internationally, can take part in the world arena, not only became the nation's admirers, the nation's voracious consumption of the product. The most difficult is that the government create the conditions so that each parent earns enough to be able to finance the education of their children.
Not only students but teachers are affected from this free education. Most of the free school teachers have limited self-development and will eventually cause trouble motivating learners should think about "survival". Worse, if the teacher thinking: the service on learners for course fees. If such situation, then the "far from the truth" to raise the quality of education.
Schools, especially small private school, will have difficulty closing the school operational costs, let alone the welfare of teachers. Financing such as electricity, water, building maintenance, computers, stationery, transport, meal allowances, and other expenses to be paid. Finding donors are increasingly difficult. Schools still survive only based spirit of service managers. Without the contribution of the learner, how the financing will close it.
Education Quality vs. Free Education
The implementation of free school does not mean loss of quality of education, decreased interest in students' learning, and decreased levels of kinrerja teacher in teaching and learning activities in the education world. For that not only the students who commuted in terms of cost, but now the teachers will also be relieved by the government's policy on the welfare of teachers will increase. In 2009 the government has decided to comply with article 31 of the 1945 state budget allocation for education by 20%. So will the availability of the budget to raise the incomes of teachers, especially teachers civil servants (PNS) are not low-ranking families with 0-year period of employment, income of at least Rp. 2 million.
BOS funds received from the school must use these funds to finance all activities within the framework of new admissions, the contribution of education funding (SPP), the purchase of textbooks, the cost of daily tests and exams, school operations and maintenance costs.
While cost is not a priority for the school and have a huge cost, such as study tours (field trips), study tours, purchase of uniforms for students and teachers for personal (not school inventory), as well as the purchase of materials or equipment that do not support school activities, all not borne the cost of BOS. And collection costs will also depend on the policies of each school, and of course the government will continue to oversee and ensure that these costs do not burden the students and parents. What if an obstacle occurs or when there are schools that are still shortcomings in the fulfillment of its operational costs? Local governments are obliged to meet the shortcomings of the existing budget funds. In order for the teaching-learning process was still possible without the lack of funds.
Looking at the above conditions, it is the government's effort to mensejahterahkan its people in terms of economy and education, but would that not impose a free school but inexpensive schools, and scholarship programs. Why schools should be cheaper.Among them: cheap school is the hope of all people, not just the students and parents, but also the welfare of teachers while getting a guarantee from the government. Cheap school in many ways can be fun, without the burden borne by the child's school fees are expensive, parents send their children to be quiet affairs and fundraising to meet the needs of more families dikosentrasikan to the needs of clothing, food, shelter and health. The child can still do the activities of education, because no longer feel a burden for parents.
And is not a fun atmosphere one of the most important factor in the teaching-learning process? How learners learn best when its concentration should be divided thinking about school funding that has not paid off his parents. Or time outside of school should be split to help parents find additional revenue. Did not the case the students who committed suicide because of school fees has not become a choking warning?
The existence of cheap funding school education activities most or entirely borne by the government, could foster public trust in the role and existence of government.Government policies will soon be heard and obeyed the public while people really feel the government is on their side and tried menyejahterahkan community. Instead, the government also will have a strong political bargaining. One of the prerequisites of a strong and sovereign government is having to get love from his subjects. ***
Pros Cons of Free Education
Judging from its development, this phenomenon can not be separated from the pros and cons. For the pros with the programs say that it is the government's efforts to improve the quality of education and decreasing numbers of school dropouts, free schooling for parents to reduce the burden of his mind to the issue of education costs and no more kids who should not take the exam only because it has not paid the school fees. While the cons say the government is like saviors, This is because there has been the first to do so, the NGOs concerned with education and treatment community can not afford. The existence of the school lacked a sense of need, awareness of the education is lacking, children are more concerned with jobs than have schools that do not spend anything. Cost of free education only up to Junior Secondary School Senior Secondary School while not. While Ataslah Senior High School graduate who is the main spear and age are established to search for jobs and generating foreign exchange.
Schools to be qualified because sustained by learners who have a passion to learn.They want to learn if there are challenges, one of which cost challenges. Fostered the young generation not to have a completely free mentally. Should mentally free washing away. Hard working, humble, tolerant, able to adapt, and piety, that is what should be grown so that younger generations are able to compete internationally, can take part in the world arena, not only became the nation's admirers, the nation's voracious consumption of the product. The most difficult is that the government create the conditions so that each parent earns enough to be able to finance the education of their children.
Not only students but teachers are affected from this free education. Most of the free school teachers have limited self-development and will eventually cause trouble motivating learners should think about "survival". Worse, if the teacher thinking: the service on learners for course fees. If such situation, then the "far from the truth" to raise the quality of education.
Schools, especially small private school, will have difficulty closing the school operational costs, let alone the welfare of teachers. Financing such as electricity, water, building maintenance, computers, stationery, transport, meal allowances, and other expenses to be paid. Finding donors are increasingly difficult. Schools still survive only based spirit of service managers. Without the contribution of the learner, how the financing will close it.
Education Quality vs. Free Education
The implementation of free school does not mean loss of quality of education, decreased interest in students' learning, and decreased levels of kinrerja teacher in teaching and learning activities in the education world. For that not only the students who commuted in terms of cost, but now the teachers will also be relieved by the government's policy on the welfare of teachers will increase. In 2009 the government has decided to comply with article 31 of the 1945 state budget allocation for education by 20%. So will the availability of the budget to raise the incomes of teachers, especially teachers civil servants (PNS) are not low-ranking families with 0-year period of employment, income of at least Rp. 2 million.
BOS funds received from the school must use these funds to finance all activities within the framework of new admissions, the contribution of education funding (SPP), the purchase of textbooks, the cost of daily tests and exams, school operations and maintenance costs.
While cost is not a priority for the school and have a huge cost, such as study tours (field trips), study tours, purchase of uniforms for students and teachers for personal (not school inventory), as well as the purchase of materials or equipment that do not support school activities, all not borne the cost of BOS. And collection costs will also depend on the policies of each school, and of course the government will continue to oversee and ensure that these costs do not burden the students and parents. What if an obstacle occurs or when there are schools that are still shortcomings in the fulfillment of its operational costs? Local governments are obliged to meet the shortcomings of the existing budget funds. In order for the teaching-learning process was still possible without the lack of funds.
Looking at the above conditions, it is the government's effort to mensejahterahkan its people in terms of economy and education, but would that not impose a free school but inexpensive schools, and scholarship programs. Why schools should be cheaper.Among them: cheap school is the hope of all people, not just the students and parents, but also the welfare of teachers while getting a guarantee from the government. Cheap school in many ways can be fun, without the burden borne by the child's school fees are expensive, parents send their children to be quiet affairs and fundraising to meet the needs of more families dikosentrasikan to the needs of clothing, food, shelter and health. The child can still do the activities of education, because no longer feel a burden for parents.
And is not a fun atmosphere one of the most important factor in the teaching-learning process? How learners learn best when its concentration should be divided thinking about school funding that has not paid off his parents. Or time outside of school should be split to help parents find additional revenue. Did not the case the students who committed suicide because of school fees has not become a choking warning?
The existence of cheap funding school education activities most or entirely borne by the government, could foster public trust in the role and existence of government.Government policies will soon be heard and obeyed the public while people really feel the government is on their side and tried menyejahterahkan community. Instead, the government also will have a strong political bargaining. One of the prerequisites of a strong and sovereign government is having to get love from his subjects. ***
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar